AI and reality distortion: Perspective on the progress of AI in Entertainment and Mainstream Media + Dark AI

A question was asked of me today - my father watched a Sunday morning show segment on AI generated "actors" and related topics. He asked for my perspective. I figured it would make a solid blog post, so here we go into the rabbit hole of my mind once again.

I've been watching AI generated content out of simple curiosity of the quality of the product and to watch its development. It's come a long way quite fast. My opinion: it's good. Really good in some cases. It's not going to replace human entertainment completely in my lifetime, but it will compliment and/or augment it. Of course someone is going to monetize the concept, as they already are. My biggest concern isn't about the entertainment part of the story, that's Hollywood's and mass-media's concern. The major risk I see is mainstream deepfakes that are so ultra realistic most won't be able to tell it's fake - populous manipulation using faces and voices we know and trust to spread misinformation like a virus, causing mass hysteria, sewing chaos, and manipulation of political ideals that could lead to uprising or violence under false pretense. The tech is already being used to spread fake news and distort realities online, and also defraud people by cloning family members or colleagues to extort money. We're half a breath away from some threat actor using it on major media outlets. It's so good, it's getting challenging even for someone like me to determine what is real and what is AI generated anymore. 

 

Losing trust in what we see and what we hear is the biggest risk I see with this AI movement into the silver screen, politics, and so much more. The younger generations are unfortunately over trusting of digital content. Great little researchers, but what happens when all the content, and all the videos, are AI generated, tainting the 'reliable sources' with AI hallucinations, and fantastic distortions of the real world? You create a paradox the human brain cannot unwind, let alone comprehend. That's the psychological side of the coin here, and maybe a blog post for another day. What keeps me up at night is the real-world side of the coin.

I've been dealing with a exponential and steady increase in sophisticated cyber threats the past few months, because of Dark AI being used to initiate and automate various types of cyber attacks. Most of them very dangerous, and worse than anything I've seen over the past 30 years. And the closer we get to commercial quantum absolutely shakes me to my core. Quantum will change everything, everywhere, in ways we can't even imagine. What was once unbreakable (encryption), can be broken in seconds. What was once ultra-secure, would be ultra-weak. Blockchains - broken. RSA - broken. That means all of your accounts: personal, financial, social, crypto, work, school - everything, broken. Doesn't matter how long and complex your password is, or if you wear a hardware key around your neck (like I do) - all of your datas are mine! (as they say). 

The advanced AI we have today has already changed everything beyond belief. Then you add quantum to the mix - we're done. Quantum-proof encryption is still in its infancy, but quantum computer development is accelerating faster than ever. If you're not scare, you should be. Do some research yourself. The danger is quite real, and nearly here.

It's not all doom and gloom, there's a plethora of good coming out of this AI boom in the scientific and medial fields particularly. But the good isn't what keeps me up at night.

 

What do you think? Let me know in the comments if you like. 

Time to Air Gap

In a world of 24 hour activity literally being streamed in real time across the globe and beyond at a rate of trillions of bytes per second at the speed of light, the biggest question in privacy is how to achieve anonymity in a world where almost nothing is secret. There is still a way to go 99%. It's simpler than you think, but an effort nonetheless.

Some background. Everything we do in digital form is cataloged and stored in a vast array of databases and servers across an amazing amount of touch points, which is then synchronized across a thousand other servers for redundancy and caching, which is then backed up to dozens of other servers, with their own redundant backups. Anything you put online...any application you use...any "terms of service" you agree to...any text or media you post...remains online forever. With the right tools and search terms, anything can be searched for, or spyed on, or downloaded in an instant. It's been this way for decades, and will continue to be that way for centuries to come, especially with as connected as the planet is and as long as there is electricity.

Some discussion. Cyber attacks are a constant thing. Increasingly, we should take as a starting point that cybersecurity compromises are the third certainty in life. The cyber world is constantly at war with itself. Governments hacking governments. Corporations hacking corporations. Governments hacking corporations. Hackers hacking governments and corporations. Hackers hacking hackers. Governments and corporations hacking hackers. And then there's everyone else. Generally oblivious. Privacy is a luxury, which we give up willingly every single second of every day. The emergence of intelligent systems, artifical neural networks, and deep thinking algorithms only proliferate this further. They take, store, and learn from every bit of data we leave as breadcrumbs. Artificial intelligence is here, and it is learning. From us. And we're letting it. Give it enough processing power, and it becomes self aware. Quantum computers will make that very real, very soon.

Some perspective. Having lived through the evolution of modern computing, including the Internet, all of this is absolutely fucking amazing, and a geek's ultimate wet dream. A demonstration of true humanz genius, ingenuity, and progress (not as far as we should be, but progress nonetheless). Highly impressive in the vastness of its brilliance and simple complexity. I Iove using It, and learning about It, and protecting It. All of it, if I am completely honest, scares the living shit out of me. There is too much. It has become frightening. AI is now making decisions and inferences faster than humans, and has even been seen generating its own programming code. So, the concept of air gapping entered my mind as a way to keep safer than I already am. Most cannot see the signs, or do not want to admit they exist, however I am of the firm belief that World War III has been well underway, and we need to protect ourselves, especially our digital lives as I feel they are the most vulnerable to compromise. Stay with me, it's all relevant.

It has been discussed for decades that the next major global war would be fought half online, and half in the real world. The evidence is all there, and I do not believe it to be simple coincidence. Global newz outlets, small town newz papers, radio ztations, and zocial media have been propagating images of this war. Pick a topic...WMD's, genocide, terrorism, ransomware, deep web market hackz and seizures, arrests of crackers and phreakz, data breaches, RFID implants, cyber surveillance initiatives, counter cyber terrorism, weapons trafficking, the unavailability of bullets to the public, gun control politics, powerful botnetz, election hacks, political hackz, hardened/weaponized computer systems...I hope you get the point.

Back full circle. Traditionally, air gapping a system means it doesn't have any network interface cards, or external drives with which to access or extract the data contained within said system. You can not get close enough to implant a listening device that reads vibrations or thermal changes being given off by the system's internal hardware to convert that into bits representing the data being actively accessed (such as login credentials, encryption/decryption key exchanges, data manipulations, etc.). The only way to extract the data contained within is by sitting at the console and physically removing the locked and encrypted drives, if there is no SD port. Then, if you can pull the impossible off (which includes getting the data off campus), you would need supercomputer power to decrypt the contents of the drive, which would still take 1,000 years to break (if and unless you are lucky). There is still the idea that once you decrypt the data, it could transmit its location to its owner, meaning you too would need an air gapped system to exfilitrate the data. Then comes what you do with said data. Yet another  catch 22. The NSA, CIA, FBI, DEA, DHS, militaries, every government, and super corporations maintain their most secret data on air gapped systems. Physical access to these systems is extremely limited and highly controlled. It's considered the safest digital platform because the system isn't connected to anything but a power cable, and thus, in theory, cannot be hacked. A true digital safe, as it were. We know anything can be hacked, it just takes time. As a hacker, we count on human error and complacency, making even air gapping a 99% solution, and the best we've got. Now, take this concept and apply it to a human life. It's far simpler, and also 99%. The anomaly, is human nature.

Based on my research, here is what I have learned about how to go 99% off grid digitally. While I do not yet practice everything I note here, I am closer than even those who know me best are even aware.

1) Get off the internet, period. No social media, no surfing the clearnet, no online purchases, no clearnet email accounts. If it becomes absolutely necessary to access the Internet for a specific purpose, there are completely anonymous ways to do these tasks, on secure systems like Tails over TOR, for example, using cryptocurrency, and ghost mailboxes. Avoid Google at all costs. Use TOR browser, responsibly (www.torproject.org). But generally, just leave it all. Stop posting immediately, delete your accounts, and never go back.
2) Get rid of your smartphones, tablets, Windows and Apple computers, smart devices (TV's and refrigerators included), iRobots, etc. Need a cell phone? Buy a prepaid flip phone, and change it (and the number) every month (aka burners). Every phone can eventually be traced and tracked. Still need a computer? Learn Linux, how to secure it, and practice way smarter browsing habits (use TOR browser), if you browse at all. Keep in touch with world events, anonymously, and continuously hone your skills.
3) Always use cash or cryptocurrency, for everything. If you have to make an online purchase, use cryptocurrency, the deep web (local markets only, don't buy overseas, and be very careful), and have it shipped somewhere that is not your home, like a post office box, a business, or an associate's location, under a false name. By the way, there are ATM's now that you can convert cash to BTC, and visa versa. Look it up using Duckduckgo.com (a safe search engine).
4) Drive an older car that does not have a computer in it, or at least has all analog systems. Yes, cars are also being hacked, remotely. Keep it clean and running well though, you don't want to draw undue attention. Walk or take public transportation when you can, avoiding direct face contact with cameras. When you do go places, change your entry/exit routes regularly...avoid habitual patterns, unless necessary to remain hidden in plain site (like going to work, or getting groceries).
5) If you must, have an immaculate and purposeful digital/public footprint. Which means a clean record, and a "normal" looking life, so as to not draw undue attention. Keep it super minimal and protected, even fake some details if you wish, but it has to be believable. Your outward personality must seem conforming, friendly, and genuine. When people search for you online, they need to find only what you want them to find. Purposeful is the key word here. To keep your accounts secure, use a dice word list to generate passphrases with an entropy of 7 to 10 or more words (as the host allows), and rotate passwords on a schedule.
6) Second most important after getting offline, and the best to mention as the final advice, would be live simple and minimalistic. Only get what you literally need to live comfortably, and look "normal". The trick about hiding in plain site is being distant enough that people respect your privacy, but involved enough that they believe you to be a "normal, nice guy/gal". Avoid run-ins with the law and reporters. Do not have public arguments. Remain intelligent, articulate, empathetic, determined, and most of all inquisitive. Question anything, be aware of everything.

If you can literally get out of dodge and move to the mountains in the middle of nowhere, or something like that, the closer to 99% you get. If you are not online, there is nothing to take/attack. Here again, human nature is the anomaly.

You can be connected, yet a ghost. You can see the world, without a face. You can reach out, without being reachable. The less connected you can maintain, the better. I am committed. How far are you willing to go?

~Geek

This blog is only to express the opinions of the creator.  Inline tags above link to external sites to further your understanding of current methods and/or technologies in use, or to clarify meaning of certain technical terms.  Any copyrighted or trademarked terms or abbreviations are used for educational purposes and remain the sole property of their respective owners.

brought to you by http://geekofthehouse.blogspot.com

Security Systems Development Life Cycle (SecSDLC)

Security Systems Development Life Cycle

When designing information systems there are logical phases which must be considered in order to achieve maximum efficiency and effectiveness throughout the organization in every role. Throughout the six phases of the systems development life cycle (SDLC) it becomes imperative to ensure that security is integrated with each aspect of the platform. When building a security project, the same phases of the SDLC can be adapted to suite. The security systems development life cycle (SecSDLC) shares similarities with the SDLC, however the intent and activities are different. The purpose of this paper is to review and explain the phases of the SecSDLC, discussing the differences between the SDLC, and applicable certifications.

Investigation

In this phase, the project scope and goals are defined upper management. They provide the process methodologies, expected outcomes, project goals, the budget, and any other relevant constraints. “Frequently, this phase begins with an enterprise information security policy (EISP), which outlines the implementation of a security program within the organization.” (Whitman & Mattord, 2012, p. 26). Teams are organized, problems analyzed, and any additions to scope are defined, discussed, and integrated into the plan. The final stage is a feasibility study to determine if corporate resources are available to support the endeavor. The primary difference from the traditional SDLC is that management defines the project details. In the SDLC the business problems to be solved are researched and developed by the project team.

Analysis

In this phase, the documents gathers in phase one are studied and a preliminary analysis of the existing security polices is conducted. At the same time, the current threat landscape is evaluated and documented, as are the controls in place to manage or mitigate these threats. Included at this stage is a review of legal considerations that must be integrated into the security plan. The modern global threat landscape is such that any business, small or large, is susceptible to attack from a third party, whether it be directly or indirectly. Certain industries have strict requirements on how data is to be stored, shared, or manipulated. Standards such as HIPPA, NIST, PCI-DSS, the ISO27001 standard, and others provide guidelines for an organization to be certified as complaint with established processes and methods. Some industries require these certifications in order for a company to conduct business in that sector. Understanding state legislations with regards to what computer activities are deemed illegal is vital to the overall plan execution and sets the baseline for the types of security technologies that can be implemented across the enterprise. The risk assessment in this phase identifies, assesses, and evaluates the threats to the organization’s security and data. The final step in this phase is to document the findings and update the feasibility analysis. The main differences between the SDLC at this phase include the examination of legal issues, relevant standards based on the segment within which the company is situated, the completion of a formal risk analysis, and the review of the threat landscape and their underlying controls. Those aspects are specifically unique to the SecSDLC. While considering security within every phase of the SDLC is vital, the focus and scope of security considerations are vastly different compared to the SecSDLC which focuses solely on the security aspect of an information systems.

Logical Design

With the SecSDLC, this phase creates and develops the blueprints for information security across the enterprise. Key policies are examined and implemented, and an incident response plan is generated to ensure business continuity, define what steps are taken when an attack occurs, and what is done to recover from a disastrous event. Similar to the SDLC, applications, data support, and structures are selected considering multiple solutions in an approach to managing threats. Unique to the SecSDLC is the detail involved with securing the SDLC core concepts by analyzing the system security environment, functional security requirements, assurance that the security system developed will perform as expected, cost considerations with regards to hardware, software, personnel, and training, documentation of security controls that are planned or in place, security control development, use case tests and test evaluation methods. The concepts and best practices detailed by the NIST can be seen as a guide throughout this phase with regards to system hardening and expected security measures to be taken to ensure end-to-end security across the enterprise. Project documents are again updated, and as with previous phases, the feasibility study is revisited to determine whether or not to continue the project, and/or whether or not to outsource the project.

Physical Design

The fourth phase of the SecSDLC evaluates the information security technologies needed to support the created blueprint and generate alternative solutions, which dictate the final system design. Technologies evaluated in the logical design phase are the best are selected to support the solutions developed, whether they are custom built or off-the-shelf. A key component to this phase is developing a formal definition of what “success” means for the project implementation to be measured against. The design of physical security measures to support the proposed system are also included at this phase. Project documents are updated, refined, and a feasibility study is conducted to ensure the organization is prepared for system implementation. The final stage of this phase involves the presentation of the design to sponsors and stakeholders for review and final approval. If regulations such as HIPPA and/or PCI-DSS must be adhered to, the physical design the infrastructure components must be modeled after their specific requirements with regards to the machines data is stored on, how these machines are physically accessed, and how the data stored on these machines is disseminated to authorized parties. This is unique to the SecSDLC. While data access control is a standard consideration of any information system, HIPPA, for example, provides specific requirements in order to maintain the privacy of patient records and ensure that their data is only shared with specific authorized personnel within the medical industry. PCI-DSS covers how customer credit card details and identifiable data is stored, used, and accessed within a company’s network.

Implementation

This phase is similar to that of the SDLC. Selected solutions are purchased or developed, tested, implemented, and tested again. A penetration test could be conducted to ensure that the security measures installed perform as expected and the network resources are protected from third party intrusion. Personnel issues are revaluated, training and education programs conducted, and finally the complete package is presented to upper management for final sign off. The SDLC differs in this phase in that the system developed is rolled out to users for their daily use. The SecSDLC is implemented on the back end by network administrators, as approved by upper management. Aside from accessibility issues that are repaired during testing, the user has no involvement in this phase of the SecSDLC.

Maintenance and Change

This is the most important phase of the SecSDLC because of the evolving threat landscape. Older threats evolve and mature into more dangerous threats, and new threats aim for new attack vectors against system weaknesses. Active and constant monitoring, testing, modification, update, and repair must be conducted on information security systems in order to keep pace with maturing and emerging threats. Zero-day threats pose a significant threat to organizations at the cutting edge of their industry and their security plan must be flexible enough to be able to proactively prevent these threats while also integrating methods of recovery should an attack occur through an unknown vulnerability. This phase is the most different from the SDLC in that the SDLC framework is not designed to anticipate a software attack that requires a degree of application reconstruction. “In information security, the battle for stable, reliable systems is a defensive one” (Whitman & Mattord, 2012, p.29). The constant effort to repair damage and restore data against unseen attackers is a never ending process. Part of this phase includes the perpetual education of all personnel as new threats emerge and the security model is updated because an educated user is a powerful security tool.

Conclusion

The purpose of the SecSDLC is to provide the framework for designing and implementing a secure information system paradigm. Since it is based off the SDLC it shares many similarities in the processes and methods used to develop a comprehensive plan, but the intent and activities are different at each phase. While considering systems security is considered vital to every phase of the SDLC, the SecSDLC focuses solely on the implementation of technologies designed to protect an infrastructure from third party intrusion, data corruption, and data theft. The SDLC develops the systems used within a business, while the SecSDLC develops the system to protect these systems and an organization’s users.



ReferencesWhitman, M.E., & Mattord, H.J. (2012). Principles of Information Security (4th ed.). Retrieved from The University of Phoenix eBook Collection.

Digital Security Discussion

Topic of discussion in my Enterprise Models class tonight: Digital Security.  Something I touched on earlier this year.

Our text postulated: "Increasingly opening up their networks and applications to customers, partners, and suppliers using an ever more diverse set of computing devices and networks, businesses can benefit from deploying the latest advances in security technologies."

My Professor said: "My thoughts on this are opposite: by opening up your network, you are inviting trouble and the more trouble you invite in, the more your data will be at risk. I understand what they are hinting at, with a cloud based network, the latest security technologies are always available, therefore, in theory, your data is more secure. Everyone needs to keep in mind though, that for every security patch developed, there are ways around them."

He went on to mention how viruses could affect the cloud as a whole and that companies and individuals moving to cloud-based platforms will become the next target for cyber attacks as the model continues to thrive.

Which is all relevant, however I have a different perspective on digital security. My counter argument to that is user education is the key. I have debated this topic, security and system users, many times over the years. Like most of us in the industry information security is paramount. With the multiple terabytes of data we collect in our home systems, and even more in online interactions, keeping our data safe is really our last defense in privacy and security. As more companies and individuals implant their corporate and personal data upon cloud platforms there is an uneasy sense of comfort for many people, including some seasoned pros. Companies like Google and Microsoft whom both have highly successful cloud models across the board have taken responsibility for ensuring they have more than adequate digital and physical security in their data centers, which to an extent leaves it to assumption that the data and applications they warehouse and host are generally safe from intrusion. Users are the key to this whole ecosystem we have created. This is where user education becomes critical. As most seasoned techies know, in the beginning systems and system operations were highly technical in nature and only the most highly trained or technically creative individuals could initiate and manipulate computer systems. Viruses were something you caught from kids at school or coworkers, not a daily blitz of digital infections numbering in the hundreds of millions perpetually attacking in various forms. As systems got more complex in design but simpler in use the users technical ability level eventually became irrelevant. People ages 1 to 100, and even some very well trained animals, can all navigate systems and digital networks with very little effort. Our systems now do all the work for us, users simply need to provide basic instructions and gentle manipulations, instead of hard coding instruction sets and inventive on-the-fly program generation as was the status quo in the 70's, 80's, and 90's. This idle user perspective is the reason why criminal hackers are still traversing firewalls and breaking encryption algorithms, and they are growing in numbers as is evident by the number of new malware detections and infections quantified annually across all digital platforms and all continents. Educating users on general best practices for system use and maintenance, how to identify potential scams, how to detect spoofing and malformed websites, what to avoid when reading emails or reviewing search results, and which security software is functionally the best whether free or paid is critically important today more than it has ever been. The problem is that the industry has created the lazy user by essentially conveying that security is a given. Microsoft even made a concerted effort by including the Windows Firewall and Windows Defender as a part of its operating system by default so that there was some protection for their users out of the box. This was in response to a large number of users, whom had been infected by one or more viruses, that assumed they were protected because "it's from Microsoft, it has to be safe" which was further from the truth than they could understand. As an educated user that knows how to secure systems and networks, I take it upon myself to ensure that users appreciate they have to set a passwords when logging into various systems and services. I teach about the importance for digital security and how to be more security conscious with their every day interactions. I teach them how to correctly navigate Internet search results (avoiding "ads"), how to understand various security prompts and what they look like so they don't ignore them, what security solutions should be installed and how to identify them, etc. This improved knowledge has created a culture of awareness for my users both at work and at home. I am regularly consulted by my peers on how to secure their own families and how to explain it to their children. This creates a more intelligent user and thereby creates a more intelligent user community at large, making the Internet a bit more secure. All of that said, it only takes a single character missing from source code to give a programmer the ability to break the program and cause havoc, or a user inadvertently installing malware. Even the most seasoned users make these mistakes from time to time because we are all human, and as such we are fundamentally flawed, making no security solution 100% secure because they are developed and used by humans. Best you can do is make every effort to educate and secure, and hope no one targets you because if they want to get in bad enough, they will get in and you won't be able to stop them.

~Geek

Artificial Intelligence and Decision Making

In a recent discussion in my Enterprise Models class, a classmate and I discussed the limitations of Artificial Intelligence theories and human emotions. Here is my response:

From the research I have been doing over the years on AI specifically, one of the biggest challenges is how to program emotions into a computer system. I think there are two primary problems currently. One, and the main problem, is that modern computing technology processes thing in a linear fashion, every time slice of a CPU cycle is occupied by either a 1 or a 0. There is no middle ground, there is no gray area. Everything is black or white, and follows a strict logic rule set. What is currently being done with systems like Watson and Google's web crawler software is using software to simulate scenarios and have the hardware crunch the data, while another part of the software provides the processing logic through algorithmic manipulation thereby creating an intelligent system. Current intelligent systems are limited by the scope of their programming environment. Two, there isn't a programming language that yet exists that can accurately tell a computer how it needs to do what it needs to do in order to understand the logic behind a feeling. Most of the researchers I have found over the years say that technology isn't there yet, and I happen to agree. The possible solution to this quandary could be quantum computing.

With quantum computing a quibit offers a system the ability to see a data stream in two states simultaneously. Each quibit is BOTH on and off (1 and 0) in the same "time slice" of a processing cycle, leveraging the power of superposition and entanglement. This allows the system to perform many operations on the same data stream. Neural networks simulate this through software, but over hardware that still processes data in a linear fashion. What we need is the hardware to perform this, because it can perform it much faster than software could ever process the same data stream. Enter quantum computing. D-Wave Systems is the current leader in true quantum computing with their current D-Wave quantum computer, but their system is highly specialized at the moment due to a lack of programming knowledge...while the system has amazing potential, as you will see form a couple of the links below, no one really truly understands how to use it. There are other links below with details on their system and methodology.

The problem with quantum computing is it requires a completely new way of perceiving computers and also a completely new way for users to interface with computers, not to mention new hardware that performs in ways modern hardware cannot. That is what I see as the next way of technological evolution. As transistors become subatomic through the help of graphine and carbon nanotubes, and technologies like memristors look to shatter our perceptions on information storage capacities and data throughput, quantum computers will become more common place across the landscape. The ability to create a true quantum system capable of processing complex emotional patterns is very real. Once we have a true quantum processor, and a true quantum operating system, then we will not only have the power to process it in fractions of nanosecond but also the programming logic and syntax to leverage an intelligent system, and possibly create a sentient computer system, otherwise known as AI.

AI is an fascinating concept, and exactly why it will be the focus of my post grad work. Quantum computing has been a subject I have dreamed about and followed since I was a young boy, before computers were common place and technology was still considered a super luxury. Today technology is seen as a necessary commodity, but there are still concepts that have yet to be discovered or invented, and quantum computing is currently the field of interest. Once we researchers and scientists figure it out, it will change the world.


D-Wave System References:
http://recode.net/2014/09/25/d-wave-ceo-our-next-quantum-processor-will-make-computer-science-history-video/
http://www.dwavesys.com/quantum-computing
http://www.dwavesys.com/d-wave-two-system
http://time.com/4802/quantum-leap/


Quantum Computing References:
http://techland.time.com/2013/09/25/the-carbon-nanotube-breakthrough-moores-law-needs-to-survive-well-see/
http://phys.org/news387.html
http://www.physics.ox.ac.uk/nanotech/research/nanotubes/index.html
http://www.tum.de/en/about-tum/news/press-releases/short/article/30589/

Technology Roadmap - Wearables

Since I started working on my Masters in Information Systems, I have been learning a lot about many different aspects of IS.  Aside from it really helping me focus my perspective on what I want to end up researching for my post-grad work, I really have been enjoying all that I am learning, and this recent class (as of this post) is no exception.

The last paper I did in this class, CGMT557 Emerging Technologies & Issues, was to create a technology roadmap for an emerging technology.  While it is something I blogged on about a month ago, I chose wearables to extend the concept into a full plan.  Here's my 2 cents...~Geek

Technology Road Map: Wearables

Current State of Technology

            Wearables are extensions of our smart phones, tablets, and phablets offering a set amount of capabilities that are inferior to our smart devices but highly functional as they are currently designed.  With innovations through miniaturization and improved power efficiencies, curved glass high resolution screens, products like the various takes on the computerized watch accessory, Samsung Gear Fit bracelet accessory and other exercise monitors, Google Glass wearable computers, various applications of systems embedded into clothing for various purposes (muscular development, health monitoring, etc.), biological chips that hold medical conditions and history details embedded under the skin, are all wearable technologies that are already changing how a lot of services are being delivered.  Through improving miniaturization processes and improved manufacturing capabilities through more precision automation systems these wearable technologies will cause market disruption for various products that currently dominate the technology market such as laptop computers and other larger portable computing devices.

Business Initiatives and Drivers & Technology Landscape

            As the mobile workforce continues to expand through thinner and lighter computing devices with more available connections to high-speed access points, many businesses are able to follow their normal workflows without being physically tethered to their offices.  Currently there is a suite of devices that enable the mobile workforce, including smartphones, tablets, and laptop computers.  Their integrated devices, security feature sets, and in some instances rugged designs, lend themselves to providing a highly portable and productive work platform available from any location with a data connection.  As a sales person in a world of light speed communications and instant gratification, being able to access critical customer and product metrics with a couple taps of a fingertip are the difference between generating and landing opportunities versus potentially losing them completely.  Combined with back office line-of-business applications linked through the Internet, the mobile workforce is able to efficiently and effectively conduct business without geographic limitation.  Wearable technologies aim to revolutionize how business is conducting allowing for more efficient multitasking through wearable communication devices, powerful wearable computers, biological microprocessors that can use near field communications to interact with the environment and connect to wireless Internet devices to retrieve data from corporate data warehouses that then use the wearable computers to process and display said information for use and/or sharing.  Nanotech devices that can enable video and audio communications through cybernetic-like implants beaming high quality, high definition signals directly into the users sensory receptors providing for an immersive experience that functions at the speed of thought.  These same nanotech devices, once outfitted with artificial intelligence logic and processing, would become the next generation of executive or administrative assistant, able to recognize trends in a user’s usage patterns to help to anticipate potential reactions to situations and provide guidance on how to successfully navigate the landscape while providing useful data streams of relevant information enabling an intelligent and informed decision process.  When a worker is presented with all the relevant data pertaining to a situation and is able to perceive all the potential outcomes of reactions to interactions, with the assistance of intelligent nanotechnologies, they are able to make the best choice for a given situation resulting in improved satisfaction, a higher probability of positive outcomes, and in turn increased revenues. 

Gap Analysis & Migration Strategy

            In order for wearable technologies to successfully transition into the enterprise on a wide-spread basis, there are a few key gaps that need to be addressed as this emerging technology evolves.  The first gap to be addressed is the technologies themselves, as a majority of these capabilities are either in their early stages of development or are only partially implemented.  As mentioned, wearable technologies are currently used as accessories for their larger host devices integrating key functionality into said accessory, such as voice-to-text/text-to-voice capabilities, capturing of health data for monitoring purposes, both capable without the use of large or complex devices that may or may not be portable themselves.  In order for wearable devices to successfully evolve into independent computing systems, circuit, transistor, and storage technologies must continue to miniaturize to nano-scale form factors.  With the recent developments of carbon nanotubes and memristors these microscopic form factors are becoming reality.  There is a group out of Australia that has successfully created a nano-transistor that is a single phosphorus atom, whose atomic radii is 0.098 nanometers.  This is a direct step into nano-transistors that, once the research is complete, will result in sub-nano scale computing methods, and is should lead to quantum computing.  This would establish the foundation for very powerful systems that could be easily embedded into biological hosts to enable the advanced collaboration and communication methods necessary to conduct business in the next generation. The next gap to analyze would be embedding these systems into biological hosts, taking advantage of the bioelectricity generated to maintain continuous power states as well as neurologically connecting said bio-hosts to these nano systems to provide cohesive functionality that does not impede either entity.  Currently no solutions exist, however neural and material sciences have made advances creating technologies that can mimic such environments, and thus lead to an understanding on how to interface with them directly through biological and chemical processes.

Governance

            The Federal Communications Commission (n.d.) website states that they regulate interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and U.S. territories.  They are the primary authority for communications law, regulation and technological innovation.  As such, they would be responsible for mandating policy on how to manage the integration of nano devices into mainstream use and where their use is inappropriate.  As the industry evolves and technologies continue to shrink, the FCC will be at the forefront of determining how and when the use of these technologies is ultimately appropriate for public integration once the core infrastructure is in place.  Currently, there are no specific laws dictating how or when these devices can be used, only that they cannot actively interfere with other electronics, and must receive interference from other electronics, such as is the standard mandate of all consumer electronics based on the stamp shown on each device approved by the FCC for use.

Conclusion

            There has been a shift happening the past couple decades that the author has been tracking along with some peers.  As technology advances and devices continue to shrink in size while increasing in power users are following suit by moving from clunky desktop systems, to laptops, to ultra-books, to tablets, smart phones, and now wearables.  With as capable as wearable computing is commercially available today, combined with the research being done in nanotechnology and artificial intelligence and cloud-based service offerings and vast storage facilities, the future of wearable computers is already well in hand, with more innovations coming as we begin to fully understand how to manipulate and integrate such technologies as nanotubes and nanowires to allow us to take computing capabilities down to microscopic levels.  The potential is nearly limitless, with the ability to theoretically build nanomachines that are self-sufficient, self-reliant, and highly aware.  Wearable microprocessors that are embedded in a person’s skin could be the hub that enables personal interactions with our various devices and daily system interactions, also medical facilities, civil and government facilities, as well as large scale advertisements to provide a highly customized and personal experience not previously capable.  There are privacy and security considerations to be understood, which will require that regulations be put into place to protect the providers of these devices as much as it protects the users of wearable devices.  Those can only be realized as these technologies continue to be developed and infiltrate the professional realm.

References

98 Pm in nm. (2014). Retrieved from http://tejji.com/convert/length-metric.aspx?q=98-Pm-in-nm

Anthony, S. (2013). Killing silicon: Inside IBM’s carbon nanotube computer chip lab. Retrieved from http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/147596-killing-silicon-inside-ibms-carbon-nanotube-computer-chip-lab

Federal Communication Commission. (n.d.). What We Do. Retrieved from http://www.fcc.gov/what-we-do

University of Phoenix. (2014). Week three supporting activity: effect of emerging technologies on services. Retrieved from University of Phoenix, CMGT557 - Emerging Technologies and Issues website.

Size of phosphorus in several environments. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.webelements.com/phosphorus/atom_sizes.html

Smith, D. (2012). Nano-transistor breakthrough to offer billion times faster computer. Retrieved from http://www.smh.com.au/technology/sci-tech/nanotransistor-breakthrough-to-offer-billion-times-faster-computer-20120221-1thqk.html

Wearable Technologies: An Academic Discussion

For the moment, wearables are extensions of our smart phones and phablets offering a set amount of capabilities that are inferior to our smart devices but highly functional as they are currently designed. With innovations through miniaturization and improved power efficiencies, curved glass high resolution screens, products like the various takes on the computerized watch accessory, Samsung Gear Fit bracelet accessory and other exercise monitors, Google Glass wearable computers, various applications of systems embedded into clothing for various purposes (muscular development, health monitoring, etc.), biological chips that hold medical conditions and history details embedded under the skin, are all wearable technologies that are already changing how a lot of services are being delivered. Through improving miniaturization processes and improved manufacturing capabilities through more precision automation systems these wearable technologies will cause market disruption for various products that currently dominate the technology market such as laptop computers and other larger portable computing devices. There has been an shift happening the past couple decades that I have been tracking along with some peers. As technology advances and devices continue to shrink in size while increasing in power users are following suit by moving from clunky desktop systems, to laptops, to ultra books, to tablets, smart phones, and now wearables. The newest small, accessory-like devices have more computing power contained in them, and technical capability, than did the first dozen computers I owned growing up, combined. With as capable as wearable computing is commercially available today, combined with the research being done in nanotechnology and artificial intelligence and cloud-based service offerings and vast storage facilities, the future of wearable computers is already well in hand, with more innovations coming as we begin to fully understand how to manipulate and integrate such technologies as nanotubes and nanowires to allow us to take computing capabilities down to microscopic levels. The potential is nearly limitless, with the ability to theoretically build nanomachines that are self sufficient, self reliant, and highly aware, that could be able to repair genetic defects within DNA that result in terminal illnesses, mental disabilities, or other debilitating genetic predispositions passed down through the generations. Wearable microprocessors that are embedded in a persons skin could be the hub that enables personal interactions with our various devices and daily system interactions, also medical facilities, civil and government facilities, as well as large scale advertisements to provide a highly customized and personal experience not previously capable. Are there be privacy concerns, of course. Will there be instances of data theft, of course. Will it be a deterrent for mass adoption of such systems, no I do not think so. This is not different than the current state of things with our smart phones, tablets, phablets, laptops, flash drives, and cloud-based facilities. With as convenient as it becomes for dealing with usually stressful situations, such as going to the doctor, visiting a busy DMV, or being able to pay for products in a crowded store quickly, people would begin to see the benefits of convenience begin to far outweigh the potential invasions of privacy. Being able to have your personal details quickly at hand, regardless of what level of detail the user decides to include, does provide the basis for process innovation through technological innovation. Wearables will become the primary outlet for the next generation of data sharing and digital interaction.




What do you think about the future of wearable technologies? ~Geek

Market Segmentation - A Geek's Perspective

So one of the "Applications" sections of one of my chapter readings this week about market segmentation, coupled with a conversation I had earlier today with a great friend, spawned this blob of words.

Is the World Coming Closer Together? Many social commentators maintain that youth and teens are becoming more alike across countries over time. Others, although not disputing the fact, point out that differences between cultures at even younger ages by far exceed the similarities.

Take a position: People are becoming more and more similar, versus, The differences between people of different cultures far outweigh their similarities.

My reply:
Learning about segmentation was interesting this week. What it made me think about is how different everyone's tastes are, but also similar the world has become from where it has been. There was a question at the end of one of the chapters that asked that exactly. "Take a position: People are becoming more and more  similar versus The differences between people of different cultures far outweigh their similarities." I think our world is in a transitional period where the older generations are being moved out of their positions of power and influence, and the next generation is moving in with different worldly perspectives. At the moment, Baby Boomers are in positions of power around the world, but the Gen X and Y groups are quickly climbing the corporate and political ranks as the Boomers start to retire younger and younger. Age is becoming a non issue for the most part in a lot of industries as skill sets become a commodity that only experience can make more attractive, but consumers seem to be preferring interactions with younger workers, which demonstrates a level of segmentation from the consumer perspective as the younger and more modern generations start to become consumers of luxury items as their disposable income increases also at younger ages. I asked a group of teenagers (13-15 year olds) the same question. They pretty much all agreed with my theory. They look to interact with service providers that they can better relate to, and communicate at higher and higher levels of technical expertise on modern conveniences, rather than someone who reminds them of their parents, grandparents, or great-grandparents whom constantly offer their displeasure of such interactions. Racial lines are being blurred to the point of nonexistence in the younger generations waiting for their chance to be in positions of power and influence so they can make their mark in the world and change its perspective. Good marketers are being more creative with establishing brand messages that span most age groups and demographic groups around the planet, channel guidelines are well established and generally followed, and the gray area of taboo marketing has a tendency to go viral with the technically affluent community regardless of their age. The Internet offers a platform that supports extreme freedoms of expression, open sharing of information, and has a connectivity factor that has more than 4+ billion users around the globe a few milliseconds (or less) from each other. As such, marketing campaigns that would not be seen as appropriate (taboo) for conventional marketing channels like TV and radio are finding their place online where segmentation does not technically exist. With as connected as everyone is today, it makes sense why every interaction with our devices and machines renders some ad for a product that specifically appeals to you and your friends. Marketers are good at what they do, and technology makes it a lot easier to shift marketing methods at the speed of progress.

What do you think? Am I on the right track or completely off base? ~Geek

Reference:

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2012). Marketing Management (14th ed.). Retrieved from http://www.coursesmart.com/SR/7147203/9780132103008/617?__hdv=6.8.

Hackers & Stuxnet: Education & Best Practices can Change Perspectives

Speaking of hackers in general, the video "Creating panic in Estonia" was well done.  It speaks to aspects of cyber security I have touched on personally with peers and users who are generally unaware of how dangerous the Internet can be, and do not understand how they should be protecting themselves and in turn the rest of the user community at large.  The global dependency on the Internet as a necessary aspect of daily life can, and may, eventually lead to its demise.  It used to be seen as a tool, something that made research easier or necessitated more efficient processing of goods and services to customers.  The global Internet is far more interconnected than most people can comprehend.  We, as IT pros and field experts, find ourselves at a unique crossroads when it comes to the cyber realm.  On one hand, we are users who find entertainment and conduct business transactions through the Internet.  We keep in touch with friends, relatives, and associates.  Pay bills and send gifts to people, through the Internet.  We curiously investigate other perspectives on anything we can think of, reachable with a simple search string.  On another hand we develop and/or service information systems and are responsible for ensuring that the users are not their own worst enemy, and the executive stakeholders understand why expenses are necessary to ensure seamless operations while maintaining data security and integrity through digital interactions across the company or across the Internet.  Yet another proverbial fork is that of a hacker.  Not necessarily one that breaks into systems with malicious intent, which are primarily the hackers (criminals) most people hear about, but the white hat hacker who, like the man who works for Kaspersky in Russia, looks to improve the quality and safety of the Internet.  In order to beat a hacker, one must be able to think like a hacker, and have the intimately specific knowledge of software and systems, how they interconnect, and how users interact with them.  This whole-view perspective on digital communications is necessary in order to properly safeguard oneself, and also the global user community.  Education and repetitive reinforcement have been the successful combination for me in getting users at all levels to start to invest in cyber security and take a different view on what they share on the web.  People contact me regularly to clean infections from their systems and networks.  Unfortunately, most of these users are of the mindset that "it should just work, and never give me problems, regardless of what I do" which has no substantive basis in reality.  In reality, it takes the combination of dozens, if not hundreds, of software applications to make a system function the way it does today.  Since no user situation is ever the lab-tested "ideal" situation, users must be educated on not only how to use their system, but a basic level understanding of how their use affects everyone connected to their system, and the subsequent systems the collective interacts with.  As experiences and exposure to different interactive scenarios manifest, continued education is the key which not only makes a better user but a better system as a whole.

The Stuxnet event could have been avoided with the right engineer designing security protocols, establishing policies, and integrating hardware solutions designed specifically at denying access to unauthorized devices on a network.  Granted, Estonia may not have had access to the technology necessary to affect such a system, but those types of systems do exist.  It is this reason why companies like Symantec, McAfee, and Kaspersky have integrated a feature into their anti-everything software packages to instantly scan any removable device attached to a protected system.  Granted, the Stuxnet did not yet have a known signature and thus could not be specifically scanned for, but those packages also have zero-day detection capabilities, meaning they have an algorithm designed into the software to detect virus-like patterns and flag them as suspicious - which is how Stuxnet was ultimately found, through a zero-day detection algorithm.  While they are highly effective, they can only be detected on a system with this type of software installed.  Unfortunately, there is a large number of users who do not have protective software, let alone hardware solutions, installed in their systems and/or networks which leaves them, and anyone they connect to, highly vulnerable.  Here again, education is the key - once the people can be made to understand the risks involved, they will be willing to learn how to best safeguard themselves, which protects everyone else they interact with digitally.  It is like getting an immunization for a disease - if everyone gets the shot, then no one can transfer it or get it from someone who is infected or has not had their immunization.  The shot cures any carriers of the disease, prevents spreading of the disease to others, and does not allow the inoculated to become carriers again.  That is the same philosophy of security software, and important for the same reasons.

~Geek

Reference: Video On Demand - http://digital.films.com/PortalPlaylists.aspx?aid=7967&xtid=50121&loid=182367

Automated Systems: Will Human Interaction go the way of the Dodo?

Recently, a classmate of mine posed the following statement;
"Do you see automated systems advancing in the near future to save developers more money? I understand that most times there needs to be human to human contact, but there has to be some way to take this to the next level. Software applications are replacing ATM's for crying out loud! I see this as another threat to humans' jobs though. I guess you just have to work in the right field." ~Jermaine Edwards


Here's some of my thoughts on the subject - what do you think?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eventually intuitive systems will replace most human to human interaction in the short term, making developers wallets fatter and our lives simpler. Programs will continue to get more complex as the demands of users change and technology advances.  The drawback is reduction in jobs, as was experienced during the first industrial revolution when mass production changed the way everything was done, and who was no longer needed on the manufacturing floor.  As you mentioned, ATM's are being replaced with iPhone apps.  Eventually, I think bank branches will be replaced by full-service, online, interactive banking.  We have robots that build our vehicles - one robot can do the work of 100 men in far less time; robots that perpetually clean our floors and recharge themselves when necessary; planes that can fly themselves around the world without pilot interference, etc..  I think beyond our lifetimes is when true artificial intelligence will be born, like we see in movies today.  Only then do I think will human interaction become obsolete because it will not longer be necessary - an intelligent machine in our life will perform many, if not all, of the functions we perform today, leaving little left for the human to do except system maintenance and maintain physical relationships as desired.  That may be an extreme example, but one that I think has a real chance of eventually becoming reality with the way technology is advancing.  It is a trickle down effect - a new advancement causes a common product to become obsolete which leaves manufacturers without a product to make, distributors without a product to sell, and service providers without a means to an end.  The consumer enjoys the benefit of a great product delivered quicker than ever, but the supply chain dwindles to a computer server and a delivery truck.  This is a profitable arrangement for the manufacturers but leaves everyone that was in the middle stuck to reinvent themselves or close their doors.

There is also another side to this - the green effect, meaning that the reduction in effect on the environment and the effect that has on job availability. As technology advances, so too do the materials they are manufactured from.  Most machines and consumables can be recycled today, or are biodegradable and non-toxic.  Also, the increase in use of Internet based storage and collaboration has significantly reduced the amount of paper output, as well as reduced the quantity of laser toner/ink cartridges used, which further reduces the environmental impact.  This affects the job market as well, automation has a long history of leaving people/industries jobless, such as when mass production was introduced in the early 20th Century and a lot of factory workers were replaced with machines.  As technology advances we invent or refine machines to help us in our endeavors, initially as tools to enhance an experience or quicken a solution.  Now, machines are seen as a necessity of life - for many to keep up with an ever evolving world, for others just to keep track of their daily lives.  Whatever it is used for, humans are more dependant on machines and technology now than we every have been.  Unfortunately, I think a dose of laziness is driving a lot of today's innovations, leaving consumers to sit on their couches, at their desks, or in their cars doing whatever they want, whenever they want. 

As far as working in the right field, IT seems to be a big fit now and in the future.  We must be mindful not to loose control though, what if god forbid every electronic system on the planet went dead and we all had to go back to doing it manually.  Since business has married to technology for a while now, how many companies, and individuals for that matter, do you think could really survive in an old-fashioned world?  My guess, a lot less than any of us think.


Tell me what you think, post a comment below.


-Geek